Context tells you how dangerous a vulnerability is to your organization
Threat intelligence is only useful when it lands on your assets, your exposure and your business context. AegisVMP correlates the outside world with the inside one.
Evidence, not isolated alerts
A single source can suggest. Independent sources agreeing on the same asset is a stronger basis for action.
Corroborated signal
One observation is a data point. Several agreeing observations are evidence.
When vulnerability data, threat intelligence and security telemetry point at the same asset, confidence rises and the finding moves up the queue for a reason a team can explain.
- Independent sources agree
- Confidence is stated, not implied
- The reasoning stays attached to the finding

Severity describes the flaw. Context describes the danger.
The same vulnerability can be an emergency on one asset and a routine item on another. Contextual risk scoring makes that difference explicit.
Severity alone
One number, no context
A severity rating describes the vulnerability. It does not describe your organization.
- Finding AHigh
- Finding BHigh
- Finding CHigh
Three findings look identical, so the queue offers no guidance.
Contextual risk
Severity plus organization context
Exposure, asset criticality, threat context and business meaning separate the same three findings.
- Finding ACritical
- Finding BModerate
- Finding CLow
Context tells you how dangerous a vulnerability is to your organization.
Contributing factors
What goes into a score
- Vulnerability severity
The technical severity of the underlying issue.
- Threat intelligence
Threat context associated with the vulnerability.
- Exploitability signals
Indicators relating to likelihood of exploitation.
- Asset criticality
How important the affected asset is to the organization.
- Exposure
How reachable or accessible the affected system may be.
- Business context
The organizational meaning of the affected system.
Scores are explainable: every factor that moved a finding up or down stays visible.
Exposure
Reachability changes everything
represents how reachable or accessible an affected system may be. The same vulnerability carries a different meaning on an internet-reachable system than on an isolated one.
- Internet reachablerelative weight
- Partner network reachablerelative weight
- Internal onlyrelative weight
- Isolated / segmentedrelative weight

See the route, not just the rungs
Relationships between systems and vulnerabilities are represented as paths, showing how progression toward important assets could occur.

The vocabulary, defined
Shared definitions so security, engineering and leadership discuss the same concepts the same way.
- CVSS
- Measures the technical severity of a vulnerability.
- EPSS
- Estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited.
- CISA KEV
- A catalog of vulnerabilities known to have been actively exploited.
- Exposure
- Represents how reachable or accessible an affected system may be.
- Attack Path
- A sequence of reachable systems or vulnerabilities that may enable progression toward a target.
- Contextual Risk
- Risk calculated using vulnerability, threat, asset, exposure and business context.
Bring context to your own findings
Request a walkthrough of AegisVMP and see how unified intelligence changes what your team works on first.